The daddy of the Pune teen who mowed down two software program engineers now in custody, the minor’s lawyer right this moment scoffed on the police motion. In an unique interview to NDTV, Prashant Patil mentioned essentially the most essential bit within the matter can be proof — whether or not police have proof that he had data of his son’s actions.

The sections the police have charged him below, are anyway inapplicable, he added.

In one of the horrific circumstances of drink driving in current days, the teenager was doing 250 kmph when he hit the bike carrying the 2 engineers from Madhya Pradesh, Each of them died on the spot.

Just a few months in need of 18, the authorized age for driving, he bought bail inside 15 hours. He has been requested to work with the site visitors police of Yerawada for 15 days, and would bear counselling. He has additionally been referred to an alcohol de-addiction centre.

The choice of the Juvenile Justice Board for fast bail, with its set of straightforward circumstances, has sparked large anger. The police have mentioned they’re attempting to place the minor on trial as an grownup. They’ve additionally shut down the bar the place he and his associates had been partying and arrested the boy’s father, a distinguished builder from the town.

The police have claimed he has an ethical duty for his underage son consuming and driving. However which may not be sufficient, Mr Patil indicated.

“For any motion below prison legislation one wants data,” Mr Patil mentioned. “There needs to be proof that the daddy had full data whether or not the kid was taking out the automobile or not taking out the automobile — regardless of the case could also be,” he added.

Requested in regards to the difficulty of accountability as a dad or mum, he mentioned in civil or prison legislation, the matter has been outlined by the Juvenile Justice Act.

The police prices towards the minor’s father even have little to do with the case, he claimed. The majority of the fees towards him are below Part 75 and 77 of Juvenile Justice Act. The others relaxation below the Motor Automobile Act, he mentioned.

“Then, at then value of some burden, if we undergo the sections whilst a layman – we are going to see they speak about a bodily assault or abuse or wilful neglect,” he mentioned, declaring that the parameters should not related.

The outraged households of the 2 victims have known as it a “homicide”. Aneesh Awadhiya’s uncle Akhilesh Awadhiya mentioned, “The accused, a minor, was drunk and was driving at 240 km per hour. He didn’t have a driving licence. That is homicide, not accident”.

Even Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has questioned the Juvenile Justice Board’s choice and promised robust motion towards the teenager.